Search Article 
  
 Advanced search 
  
 
About us - Editorial board - Browse articles - Submit article - Instructions - Subscribe - Advertise - Contacts - Login 
  Users Online: 1217 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size   



 
Browse articles
REVIEW ARTICLE
J Clin Imaging Sci 2018,  8:53

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and its Mimics/Variants: A Comprehensive Review


1 Department of Neuroradiology and Neurointervention, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
2 Department of Radiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Date of Submission01-Jun-2018
Date of Acceptance12-Aug-2018
Date of Web Publication06-Dec-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Vivek S Yedavalli
Department of Neuroradiology and Neurointervention, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, S047 Palo Alto, California 94305
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jcis.JCIS_40_18

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Motor neuron diseases (MNDs) are a debilitating subset of diseases, which result in progressive neuronal destruction and eventual loss of voluntary muscular function. These entities are often challenging to distinguish and accurately diagnose given overlapping clinical pictures and overall rarity. This group of diseases has a high morbidity and mortality rate overall and delineating each type of disease can help guide appropriate clinical management and improve quality of life for patients. Of all MNDs, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is by far the most common comprising 80%–90% of cases. However, other mimics and variants of ALS can appear similar both clinically and radiographically. In this review, we delve into the epidemiological, physiological, neuroimaging, and prognostic characteristics and management of ALS and its most common MND mimics/variants. In doing so, we hope to improve accuracy in diagnosis and potential management for this rare group of diseases.

Keywords: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, postpolio syndrome, primary lateral sclerosis, progressive bulbar palsy, progressive muscular atrophy, spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy


How to cite this article:
Yedavalli VS, Patil A, Shah P. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and its Mimics/Variants: A Comprehensive Review. J Clin Imaging Sci 2018;8:53

How to cite this URL:
Yedavalli VS, Patil A, Shah P. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and its Mimics/Variants: A Comprehensive Review. J Clin Imaging Sci [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 13];8:53. Available from: http://www.clinicalimagingscience.org/text.asp?2018/8/1/53/247035






   Introduction Top


Motor neuron diseases (MNDs) are a group of diseases which result in progressive destruction of neurons and gradual deterioration of voluntary muscle function, leading to high mortality and morbidity.[1],[2] The average incidence of MNDs is 1–3 cases per 100,000. The prevalence of MND ranges from 1 to 9 cases per 100,000 worldwide. Of this group, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is by far the most common, comprising roughly 80%–90% of MND cases.[3] However, studies have shown at least a 10% error in diagnosis of ALS.[4] ALS and MND, in general, present with nonspecific symptoms such as limb weakness, fasciculations, and fatigue, which can comprise both classic upper/bulbar and lower motor neuron clinical symptoms. In addition, there are no reliable markers to differentiate ALS from other forms of MND, leading to diagnostic dilemmas.

Neuroimaging in conjunction with the clinical picture aids in differentiating subtypes of MND, especially with stratifying upper versus lower MND processes. It is of utmost importance to accurately diagnose and differentiate ALS from its mimics. Delayed diagnosis and treatment can lead to long-term neurological sequelae with far-reaching clinical complications. In this review, our objective is to elucidate the epidemiological, physiological, neuroimaging, and prognostic characteristics of ALS and its most common MND mimics/variants [Table 1].
Table 1: Summary table of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and key differentiating factors with each mimic/variants

Click here to view



   Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Top


Epidemiology

ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig's disease, is a degenerative upper and lower MND that leads to progressive weakness, muscle atrophy, fatigue, and eventually death. ALS is a rare disease with an annual incidence of 1.5 per 100,000. Motor neuron diseases, in general, tend to peak in the sixth decade with an overall male predilection. The average lifespan after diagnosis is 3-5 years with respiratory failure as the most common cause of mortality.[5] Most cases of ALS are considered sporadic, but genetic subtypes including autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and X-linked recessive patterns have been reported.[3],[6] ALS is a difficult disease to diagnose in a timely fashion due to its nonspecific and varied presentations. Diagnosis is on average delayed up to 12 months from symptom onset with an average of 13.1 months.[7] Delayed diagnosis is more often seen in younger patients, categorized as those under 45.[8]

Pathophysiology

The physiological basis of ALS is not fully understood in the current literature. Genetic factors undoubtedly play a role, but the extent to which has not been fully determined. It is thought that ALS is caused by a prion-like protein dysregulatory process affecting RNA.[9] Other plausible theories include oxidative stress, glutamate excitotoxicity, defects in neurofilament transport, and mitochondrial dysregulation.[6] Loss of Betz cells and aggregation of CD68 macrophages are the pathologic features suggestive of ALS.[10]

Neuroimaging

Neuroimaging plays a crucial role in diagnosis and exclusion of ALS. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is most useful in excluding ALS MND mimics in addition to other spectra of diseases, such as multiple sclerosis or other inflammatory conditions, which can appear radiographically. When suspecting ALS, conventional MR sequences demonstrate bilateral symmetric T2 and FLAIR hyperintensities anywhere along the corticospinal tract superiorly from the cortices extending caudally to the brainstem[11] [Figure 1]. In addition, generalized decreased cerebral volume has been reported, especially in the gray matter of the frontal and temporal lobes.[12] Of note, abnormal FLAIR hyperintensity is nonspecific and does not correlate with disease progression.[13] Within the spinal cord, T1 hypointensity and T2 hyperintensity in the anterolateral portions are characteristic and reflect gliosis and axonal degeneration. Similarly, advanced sequences such T1-weighted magnetic transfer contrast-enhanced imaging show hypointensity in the corticospinal tracts as well.[14] Positron emission tomography (PET) has a valuable role as it demonstrates decreased radiotracer uptake within the frontal and temporal lobes in affected individuals. Verbal fluency can help distinguish ALS on PET from dementia.[15] Advanced imaging techniques such as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has shown promise. DTI specifically shows preferential neuronal loss in the primary motor and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices.[16] In addition, it can show decreased fractional anisotropy in the corticospinal tracts, corpus callosum, and thalami, which signify upper motor axonal degeneration.[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22] MR spectroscopy (MRS) also has potential value where it demonstrates increased choline and myoinositol metabolic substrates localized to the precentral gyrus.[23] Studies have also shown N-acetyl aspartate/creatine ratios to be abnormal in single voxel evaluation of the corticospinal tracts.[24] These advanced techniques, while promising, currently have low sensitivity and specificity and are not used routinely in clinical practice.[6],[25] A few studies, however, have demonstrated increased utility with DTI/MRS in conjunction, especially on 3T evaluation in diagnosis of ALS and other MNDs.[26]
Figure 1: A 52-year-old male with progressive weakness with findings consistent with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). (a-d) Axial T2-weighted images involving the corona radiata (a), posterior limb of the internal capsules (b), cerebral peduncles (c), and midbrain (d).

Click here to view


Clinical presentation and management

Patients afflicted with ALS can present with a number of symptoms, which are mostly bulbar or respiratory in nature. Common bulbar symptoms thought to be due to upper motor neuron (UMN) damage include sialorrhea, facial weakness, gait abnormalities, and dysphagia.[27] Respiratory symptoms can manifest concomitantly or separately, with patients often exhibiting dyspnea, orthopnea, hypoventilation, and respiratory musculature weakness.[27] The generalized weakness, in addition to the aforementioned symptoms, is often gradual and debilitating with progressively worsening muscle wasting, possible cramping, fasciculations, and speech disturbances.[27]

ALS has no cure, but temporary treatments can often provide measures of improved quality of life. Respiratory symptom management is a mainstay of treatment as such complications are the most common cause of death in ALS patients.[27] General treatment options include artificial noninvasive ventilation for dyspnea, orthopnea, and respiratory muscle weakness. Treatment of dysphagia is also crucial, consisting of nutritional supplementation with vitamins, minerals, and creatine in conjunction with enteric feedings if the patient shows weight loss of at least 10% of their prediagnostic weight.[27] Speech therapy has also been beneficial for speech disturbances such as dysarthria.[28] Riluzole, a neuroprotective drug which blocks sodium channels in dorsal root ganglion neurons, has shown promise in treatment of ALS.[29],[30] Another promising agent that has recently emerged in treatment of ALS is Edaravone. Edaravone is an antioxidant free radical scavenger, which prevents oxidative stress and thereby prevents motor neuron death. In animal models, the medication has been shown to prevent nitration of tyrosine residues within cerebrospinal fluid and improve motor function.[31] Clinical trials have demonstrated some improvement in the revised ALS functional rating scale to assess motor function of patients with Edaravone use as well as slowing of disease progression. Some experts have also advocated combination therapy with Edaravone and Riluzole.[32]


   Primary Lateral Sclerosis Top


Epidemiology

Primary lateral sclerosis (PLS) is a disorder characterized by gradual UMN degeneration, resulting in spinobulbar spasticity with relative sparing of the lower motor neurons.[33] It is typically suggested after at least 3 years of isolated UMN symptoms according to Pringle et al.[34],[35] The most common clinical symptoms of pure PLS are spasticity, dysarthria, or compulsive laughing/crying.[34],[36] Studies have shown that spasticity without wasting after at least 3 years is more suggestive of PLS compared to other MNDs.[37] In dedicated MND clinics, PLS is seen in approximately 1%–4% of cases.

PLS subtypes can be distinguished by symptomatic progression or genetic patterns. Symptomatic subtypes include ascending and multifocal, both of which can present asymmetrically.[38] The ascending subtype characteristically shows gradual progression of symptoms from the lower extremities, initially, with subsequent involvement of the upper extremities and, finally, bulbar/pseudobulbar symptoms such as muscle spasticity and dysarthria. Zhai et al demonstrated that upper extremity symptoms on average manifest 3.6 years after the lower extremity presentation with pseudobulbar/bulbar symptoms beginning 1.5 years after the upper extremity symptomatology.[38] The multifocal subtype, on the other hand, shows patchy and asymmetric involvement which can range from initial bulbar symptoms to progressive hemiparesis. Studies have shown that patients who present with initial limb symptoms, amongst the multifocal subtype cohort, have long periods of stability, spanning multiple years, before progression to another limb group.[38],[39]

In contrast to the symptom related subtypes as described above, PLS can also be characterized based on hereditary patterns, which is labeled as the sporadic subtype. In contrast to the symptomatic subtypes which are often asymmetric in presentation, the sporadic subtype often presents with symmetric paresis. Another distinguishing factor is the scissoring gait presentation, which is also seen in the ascending subtype, but more pronounced with the sporadic form.[39] Irrespective of the subtype, this disease is rare before 29 years of age and is predominantly seen from ages 29-65 with an average onset to symptomatic presentation of 14 years post diagnosis.[39]

Pathophysiology

PLS is classically characterized by dysfunction of the descending corticospinal tracts, resulting in predominantly upper motor disease with degeneration of pyramidal cells in the precentral gyrus, in addition to absence of Betz cells.[40] The exact physiological mechanism is still not fully understood; however, it is theorized to be secondary to mutations in the ALS2 gene, which leads to protein instability and absence of normal function.[41] This is further corroborated with delayed conduction timings on motor evoked potential studies.[40]

Neuroimaging

Neuroimaging can play a critical role in the diagnosis of PLS. PLS is characterized by T2 hyperintensity within the precentral gyrus and adjacent subcortical white matter[42] [Figure 2]. Cortical atrophy primarily within the parieto-occipital regions is also seen.[36] Advanced imaging also proves useful at times with decreased fractional anisotropy and increased mean diffusivity within the corticospinal tracts and mid corpus callosum. These findings are further supported on PET and MRS studies where there is diminished activity in the precentral gyrus and corticospinal tracts.[40]
Figure 2: A 43-year-old male with excess fatigue compatible with primary lateral sclerosis. (a and b) Axial and sagittal FLAIR images demonstrate faint hyperintensities adjacent to the precentral gyri and along the corticospinal tracts. (c) Axial SWI image with susceptibility signal loss along the precentral gyrus.

Click here to view


Clinical management

Although challenging, PLS has a number of differentiating clinical presentations compared to ALS. PLS is often milder, less diffuse, and more isolated to UMN symptoms only. Patients with PLS tend to be younger at symptom onset.[37] Neurological examination of PLS showing muscle stiffness with the absence of wasting is the key clinical presentation that strongly favors PLS over ALS. PLS also had significantly lower mortality rates over a 16-year period at 33% compared to 89% in ALS.[37] Treatment of PLS is typically tailored in response to specific signs and symptoms of the affected individual. Treatments for spasticity include baclofen, anti-cholinergic medications, or benzodiazepines as well an intrathecal baclofen pump. Physical therapy can also be employed to aid with spasticity. In late disease stages, ventilator support may be necessary for progressive respiratory failure.[43]

Differentiating primary lateral sclerosis from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Neuroimaging also plays a supportive role in differentiating PLS from ALS. In conjunction with the clinical symptoms, PLS shows T2 hyperintensity and gradual atrophy isolated to the precentral gyrus and corticospinal tracts secondary to  Wallerian degeneration More Details.[36],[40] In contrast to ALS, PLS often involves the parietal and occipital lobes, while sparing the temporal lobes.[44] While similar, ALS tends to have a more diffuse presentation and rapid onset of these imaging findings. On PET studies, PLS shows hypometabolism in the precentral cortex, while ALS can have frontal lobe involvement, which is not seen in PLS. DTI also can be beneficial where PLS tends to asymmetrically affect white matter tracts while ALS involvement is more diffuse.[40] Fractional anisotropy can also differentiate ALS and PLS as the values are markedly decreased in ALS and not as pronounced in PLS.[45] PLS has a more favorable prognosis compared to ALS.[36] Some studies have shown that persistent isolated upper motor disease without lower motor neuron symptoms at least 3–4 years after diagnosis can result in patients having normal lifespans. As previously stated, PLS overall has a lower mortality rate compared to ALS with a mortality rate of 33% compared to 89% after 16 years of follow-up as shown by Tartaglia et al.[37] Electromyography (EMG) can also be utilized to differentiate the two entities, as EMG is normal or demonstrates minor or transient changes such as sparse fibrillations or fasciculations in the setting of PLS. However, in the setting of ALS, EMG demonstrates widespread motor neuron involvement.[43]


   Progressive Muscular Atrophy Top


Epidemiology

Progressive muscular atrophy (PMA) is an MND characterized by predominant lower motor neuron involvement. It is debated whether PMA is a lower motor neuron subtype within ALS versus a separate entity as certain forms of PMA have significant overlap with ALS. Certain studies favor PMA as a predominantly lower motor neuron presentation of ALS with variable UMN involvement.[10],[46] However, in the current World Federation of Neurology El Escorial Classification, PMA is viewed as a potential separate entity as “possible” ALS and will be discussed as such in this review.

Pathophysiology

The pathophysiology of PMA has considerable overlap with ALS. Histopathological analysis reveals gradual neuronal degeneration within the pyramidal tracts with ubiquitinated inclusion bodies, which are also seen in ALS.[47] Immunochemical analysis also supports the assertion that PMA is part of the ALS spectrum. DNA binding protein TDP 43 is positive in 85% of PMA and 100% of ALS cases. In addition, studies have shown CD68 macrophage positivity in pathological analysis, once again corroborating the significant overlap between PMA and ALS.[47]

Neuroimaging

MR imaging (MRI) is the mainstay for diagnosis of PMA. The main potentially differentiating imaging factors within PMA are neuronal loss and gliosis within the anterior horns of the spinal cord, manifesting as T2 hyperintensities, in the absence of corticospinal tract involvement [Figure 3]. This is in line with isolated lower MND, which is considered classic PMA.[48] DTI with fractional anisotropy (FA) offers additional utility in diagnosis of PMA in tandem with clinical analysis. In classic PMA, there is absence of corticospinal tract involvement with discrete lower motor neuron involvement.[48] When there is upper MND, DTI demonstrates symmetric and bilateral degeneration of the corticospinal tracts in similar fashion to classic ALS in the UMN and lower motor neuron form. Lower FA values are seen in ALS, PLS, and severe forms of PMA and indicate rapid disease progression.[49]
Figure 3: Adult male with acute-onset weakness compatible with progressive muscular atrophy. There are faint symmetric T2 hyperintensities within the anterior horns of the spinal cord (arrow).

Click here to view


Clinical management

As previously discussed, prognosis in PMA is significantly better than classic cases of ALS with roughly an additional 6–7 years of survival. Treatment, as with ALS, is primarily for symptomatic relief. Given the incidence of respiratory weakness, noninvasive respiratory aids are used to prolong life. Tracheostomies are also performed in severe cases.[50]

Distinguishing progressive muscular atrophy from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Although there is significant overlap with ALS, PMA has some distinguishing epidemiological features. PMA has a higher predilection in men and is diagnosed at a later age, with symptoms also presenting at a later age when compared to ALS. In addition, the duration from initial symptomatic presentation to diagnosis is longer in PMA. The most apparent differentiating factor between PMA and ALS is the significantly longer mean survival time of PMA. Patients with PMA survive up to 77 months longer from symptomatic onset when compared to ALS. Distinguishable PMA is seen in approximately 8% of patients.[46] However, isolated lower MND is seen in only 15% of patients with 85% showing both upper and lower MND.[10]


   Spinal and Bulbar Muscular Atrophy Top


Epidemiology

Spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA), also known as Kennedy's disease, is a primarily lower motor neuron X-linked recessive disease.[51] The disease tends to occur in individuals aged 18–64 years with most cases in the fourth and fifth decades.[51],[52] SBMA is rare with an prevalence of 1 in 40,000.[52] Given the genetic component, females with the gene are considered carriers and exhibit no symptoms.[52] The most common clinical symptoms are weakness, tremor, and cramping, often in an asymmetric and bulbar distribution, with associated muscle atrophy. Aspiration and speech dysarthria are also common due to the bulbar musculature being affected.[52] Distinguishing clinical features of SBMA include gynecomastia and diminished fertility in addition to sensory loss in the distal extremities. Laboratory evaluation can be beneficial, generally demonstrating elevated creatine kinase, total testosterone, and free testosterone.[51] Genetic testing is diagnostic.[52]

Pathophysiology

The pathophysiology of SBMA is secondary to a genetic mutation. It is thought to be due to a CAG repeat expansion mutation within an androgen receptor gene on the X-chromosome.[51] CAG repeat mutations are also seen in other entities such as Huntington's disease. This mutation results in a nonfunctional transcribed protein, leading to nonbinding of the testosterone molecule and its derivatives to the receptor.[52] This leads to the commonly identified clinical symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of decreased fertility, gynecomastia, as well as elevated total and free testosterone. Studies have shown that the longer the CAG repeat mutation, the earlier the age of onset for the disease.[53] The specific neurodegenerative pattern is believed to be due to a direct toxic effect from the androgen receptor on both the anterior and posterior horns of the spinal cord in addition to skeletal muscles.[52]

Neuroimaging

MRI is the most useful modality in conjunction with the clinical picture for accurate diagnosis of SBMA. MRI demonstrates atrophy of the anterior and posterior horns of the spinal cord [Figure 4] in addition to the facial, tongue, and respiratory muscles. Involvement of the muscles of mastication is characteristic. DTI has also been utilized, generally demonstrating low FA values in the body and genu of the corpus callosum.[54] Patients require close interval follow-up with video swallow studies to diagnose aspiration.[52]
Figure 4: Adult male with numbness and weakness in his lower extremities later diagnosed as X-linked spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Axial T2 images demonstrate symmetric hyperintensities involving the anterior and posterior horns of the spinal cord (arrow).

Click here to view


Clinical management

Accurate diagnosis and treatment are often delayed due to the initial nonspecific lower motor neuron symptoms. In addition to ALS, this condition is often misdiagnosed for myasthenia gravis (MS). SBMA is generally only suspected after lack of improvement with MS-specific medications in conjunction with negative genetic testing. Although there is no cure, patients generally have normal lifespans as the disease has a gradual onset. Treatment is supportive with a focus on aspiration prevention. Exercise may have potential benefits with mixed results in current literature.[52]


   Postpolio Syndrome Top


Epidemiology

Poliomyelitis is one of the causes of lower MND secondary to viral infection by the poliovirus, an RNA subtype.[55] With the advent of vaccinations, polio is fortunately one of the many conditions that have been nearly eradicated. However, even in patients who have been afflicted with polio as a child and have recovered, polio can still cause symptoms, resulting in postpolio syndrome (PPS).[55] These patients can present with progressive weakness within the extremities in a lower motor neuron distribution.[56] PPS is defined as new-onset muscle weakness at least 15 years after a fully recovered acute infection.[55] It is clinically characterized by muscle weakness, decreased endurance, pain, and joint deformities.[55] The prevalence of PPS drastically ranges from 15% to 80% depending on the population studied.[57] Some studies have shown a range of 28.5%–64%.[58] Currently, 15–20 million people worldwide are affected by PPS.[55]

Pathophysiology

The etiology of PPS is still debated. The poliovirus initially infects cells of the anterior horns of the spinal cord, resulting in acute paralysis as seen in poliomyelitis.[55] However, PPS is theorized to be Wallerian degeneration, primarily in the anterior horns, of the neuromuscular units, resulting in impairment and muscle atrophy decades after the initial infection.[59] According to such a hypothesis, there is incomplete reinnervation of the affected motor fibers which results in residual weakness and generalized motor impairment that persists for many years.[60] A second hypothesis suggests that PPS is a chronic viral infection. This is supported by findings of oligoclonal IgM bands with poliovirus antibodies in CSF of patients with known PPS. However, the exact mechanism is still widely debated.[55]

Neuroimaging

MRI can corroborate findings of PPS with a concordant clinical picture. MRI shows symmetric T2 hyperintensities within the substantia nigra, pons, medulla, anterior horns of the spinal cord, and ventral nerve roots.[61] In addition to the CNS findings, MRI can also show T1 and T2 hyperintensities within the gluteal musculature without inflammatory changes. These findings are suggestive of diffuse fatty infiltration with concomitant muscular atrophy [Figure 5].[62]
Figure 5: A 60-year-old man with a history of poliomyelitis now with weakness. (a and b) Axial computed tomographic images demonstrate fatty replacement of the quadriceps musculature (arrows). These findings are seen in postpolio syndrome. Case courtesy of Dr. Ayush Goel, Radiopaedia.org. From the case rID: 34165.

Click here to view


Clinical management

Management of PPS can involve both pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies. Studies show that treatment with IV Ig therapy in either single or multiple doses is beneficial and results in pain reduction with overall improved quality of life.[55] Dedicated anti-poliovirus medications are also being developed as they target different portions of the virus.[55] Nonpharmacological therapies such as muscle strengthening and rehabilitation are controversial with sparse literature.[55]


   Progressive Bulbar Palsy Top


Epidemiology

Progressive bulbar palsy (PBP) is a rapid-onset MND characterized by bulbar symptoms such as difficulty with neck extension, chewing, swallowing, and talking due to weakness of the oral and facial muscles.[63] It can manifest as upper or lower MND and is considered by some to be the bulbar variant of ALS, similar to the lower MND, PMA, which was previously discussed. PBP is seen in 4.1% of MND cases overall, with the highest incidence from ages 51 to 60 years.[64] PBP is more common in elderly women.[56] This disease has a mean survival time of 35–40 months after diagnosis.[65] A rapidly fatal infantile form called Fazio Londe Syndrome (FLS), characterized by cranial nerve palsies and generalized muscle weakness, has also been reported.[66] Case reports also show a similar childhood form, termed Brown-Vialetto-Van Laere Syndrome (BVVL), characterized by sensorineural deafness and ponto-bulbar palsy, resulting in dysarthria and dysphagia.[67] Of note, it is important to distinguish PBP from pseudobulbar palsy, which is a different entity altogether.

Pathophysiology

The pathophysiology of PBP is poorly understood. The childhood forms, FLS and BVVL, are associated with genetic mutations in the SLC52A genes, which encodes a riboflavin transporter and results in a riboflavin deficiency.[68] This can be corrected with riboflavin supplementation.[68] BVVL is also associated with a mutation in the C20orf54 gene. These genetic forms can have both autosomal recessive and/or autosomal dominant inheritance patterns.[69] The adult form of PBP is considered a part of the familial subset of ALS and has been linked previously to mutations in the SOD1 gene, which results in a defective copper/zinc superoxide dismutase protein.[70],[71]

Neuroimaging

Neuroimaging, particularly MRI, can play a role in diagnosis of PBP. PBP can have nearly identical MRI manifestations to ALS as it is considered by some to be a bulbar variant. In FLS, there are subtle but diffuse subcortical and deep white matter T2 hyperintensities without restricted diffusion.[68] In the adult form, MRI can show T2 hyperintense bands in the frontal lobe, corona radiata, internal capsule, pyramidal tract, and the brainstem [Figure 6]. These findings can appear similar to ALS and are challenging to differentiate.[72]
Figure 6: A 57-year-old female with rapid-onset weakness was favored to represent progressive bulbar palsy. (a and b) Symmetric T2 hyperintensities involving the posterior limbs of the internal capsules and cerebral peduncles of the midbrain (arrows).

Click here to view


Clinical management

Most patients with PBP progress to ALS and prognosis is considered poor as there is no known cure. Mean survival is approximately 40 months after diagnosis.[65] As discussed previously, treatment with riboflavin shows benefits in BVVL.[69] Treatment for the adult form focuses on symptomatic relief of the bulbar symptoms, similar to other MNDs.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Rowland LP, Shneider NA. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1688-700.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Turner MR, Kiernan MC, Leigh PN, Talbot K. Biomarkers in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:94-109.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Román GC. Neuroepidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Clues to aetiology and pathogenesis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996;61:131-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Traynor BJ, Codd MB, Corr B, Forde C, Frost E, Hardiman O, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mimic syndromes: A population-based study. Arch Neurol 2000;57:109-13.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Chiò A, Logroscino G, Traynor BJ, Collins J, Simeone JC, Goldstein LA, et al. Global epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A systematic review of the published literature. Neuroepidemiology 2013;41:118-30.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Gorodenker J, Levy LM. Genetics of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2254-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Vázquez-Costa JF, Martínez-Molina M, Fernández-Polo M, Fornés-Ferrer V, Frasquet-Carrera M, Sevilla-Mantecón T. Analysis of the diagnostic pathway and delay in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the Valencian Community. Neurología 2018. pii: S0213-4853(18)30157-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2018.03.026.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Nzwalo H, de Abreu D, Swash M, Pinto S, de Carvalho M. Delayed diagnosis in ALS: The problem continues. J Neurol Sci 2014;343:173-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Donnelly CJ, Grima JC, Sattler R. “Aberrant RNA homeostasis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Potential for new therapeutic targets?,” Neurodegener Dis Manag 2014;4:417-37.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Riku Y, Atsuta N, Yoshida M, Tatsumi S, Iwasaki Y, Mimuro M, et al. Differential motor neuron involvement in progressive muscular atrophy: A comparative study with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. BMJ Open 2014;4:e005213.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Cheung G, Gawel MJ, Cooper PW, Farb RI, Ang LC, Gawal MJ, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Correlation of clinical and MR imaging findings. Radiology 1995;194:263-70.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Mezzapesa DM, Ceccarelli A, Dicuonzo F, Carella A, De Caro MF, Lopez M, et al. Whole-brain and regional brain atrophy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:255-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Zhang L, Ulug AM, Zimmerman RD, Lin MT, Rubin M, Beal MF, et al. The diagnostic utility of FLAIR imaging in clinically verified amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:521-7.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
da Rocha AJ, Oliveira AS, Fonseca RB, Maia AC Jr., Buainain RP, Lederman HM, et al. Detection of corticospinal tract compromise in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with brain MR imaging: Relevance of the T1-weighted spin-echo magnetization transfer contrast sequence. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1509-15.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Abrahams S, Goldstein LH, Suckling J, Ng V, Simmons A, Chitnis X, et al. Frontotemporal white matter changes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol 2005;252:321-31.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Kim JE, Oh JS, Sung JJ, Lee KW, Song IC, Hong YH, et al. Diffusion tensor tractography analysis of the corpus callosum fibers in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Clin Neurol 2014;10:249-56.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Hofer S, Frahm J. Topography of the human corpus callosum revisited – Comprehensive fiber tractography using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 2006;32:989-94.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Van Zandijcke M, Casselman J. Involvement of corpus callosum in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis shown by MRI. Neuroradiology 1995;37:287-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Agosta F, Chiò A, Cosottini M, De Stefano N, Falini A, Mascalchi M, et al. The present and the future of neuroimaging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1769-77.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Wang S, Poptani H, Bilello M, Wu X, Woo JH, Elman LB, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Volumetric analysis of the corticospinal tract. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1234-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Sach M, Winkler G, Glauche V, Liepert J, Heimbach B, Koch MA, et al. Diffusion tensor MRI of early upper motor neuron involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 2004;127:340-50.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Kollewe K, Körner S, Dengler R, Petri S, Mohammadi B. Magnetic resonance imaging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurol Res Int 2012;2012:1-9.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Bowen BC, Pattany PM, Bradley WG, Murdoch JB, Rotta F, Younis AA, et al. MR imaging and localized proton spectroscopy of the precentral gyrus in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:647-58.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Chan S, Shungu DC, Douglas-Akinwande A, Lange DJ, Rowland LP. Motor neuron diseases: Comparison of single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy of the motor cortex with MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 1999;212:763-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Foerster BR, Dwamena BA, Petrou M, Carlos RC, Callaghan BC, Churchill CL, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion tensor imaging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Acad Radiol 2013;20:1099-106.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Nelles M, Block W, Träber F, Wüllner U, Schild HH, Urbach H, et al. Combined 3T diffusion tensor tractography and 1H-MR spectroscopy in motor neuron disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1708-14.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Zarei S, Carr K, Reiley L, Diaz K, Guerra O, Altamirano PF, et al. A comprehensive review of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Surg Neurol Int 2015;6:171.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Howard RS, Orrell RW. Management of motor neurone disease. Postgrad Med J 2002;78:736-41.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Wang S, Melhem ER. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and primary lateral sclerosis: The role of diffusion tensor imaging and other advanced MR-based techniques as objective upper motor neuron markers. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005;1064:61-77.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Song JH, Huang CS, Nagata K, Yeh JZ, Narahashi T. Differential action of riluzole on tetrodotoxin-sensitive and tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channels. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997;282:707-14.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Bhandari R, Kuhad A, Kuhad A. Edaravone: A new hope for deadly amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Drugs Today (Barc) 2018;54:349-60.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Sawada H. Clinical efficacy of edaravone for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2017;18:735-8.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Riad SM, Hathout H, Huang JC. High T2 signal in primary lateral sclerosis supports the topographic distribution of fibers in the corpus callosum: Assessing disease in the primary motor segment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:E61-4.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Pringle CE, Hudson AJ, Munoz DG, Kiernan JA, Brown WF, Ebers GC, et al. Primary lateral sclerosis. Clinical features, neuropathology and diagnostic criteria. Brain 1992;115(Pt 2):495-520.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Gordon PH, Cheng B, Katz IB, Mitsumoto H, Rowland LP. Clinical features that distinguish PLS, upper motor neuron-dominant ALS, and typical ALS. Neurology 2009;72:1948-52.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Kuipers-Upmeijer J, de Jager AE, Hew JM, Snoek JW, van Weerden TW. Primary lateral sclerosis: Clinical, neurophysiological, and magnetic resonance findings. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;71:615-20.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Tartaglia MC, Rowe A, Findlater K, Orange JB, Grace G, Strong MJ, et al. Differentiation between primary lateral sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Examination of symptoms and signs at disease onset and during follow-up. Arch Neurol 2007;64:232-6.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Zhai P, Pagan F, Statland J, Butman JA, Floeter MK. Primary lateral sclerosis: A heterogeneous disorder composed of different subtypes? Neurology 2003;60:1258-65.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Floeter MK, Mills R. Progression in primary lateral sclerosis: A prospective analysis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler 2009;10:339-46.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Statland JM, Barohn RJ, Dimachkie MM, Floeter MK, Mitsumoto H. Primary lateral sclerosis. Neurol Clin 2015;33:749-60.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
ChandranJ, Ding J, Cai H. “Alsin and the molecular pathways of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.,” Mol Neurobiol 2007;36:224-31.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Butman JA, Floeter MK. Decreased thickness of primary motor cortex in primary lateral sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:87-91.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Singer MA, Kojan S, Barohn RJ, Herbelin L, Nations SP, Trivedi JR, et al. Primary lateral sclerosis: Clinical and laboratory features in 25 patients. J Clin Neuromuscul Dis 2005;7:1-9.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Smith CD. Serial MRI findings in a case of primary lateral sclerosis. Neurology 2002;58:647-9.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Iwata NK, Kwan JY, Danielian LE, Butman JA, Tovar-Moll F, Bayat E, et al. White matter alterations differ in primary lateral sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 2011;134:2642-55.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Kim WK, Liu X, Sandner J, Pasmantier M, Andrews J, Rowland LP, et al. Study of 962 patients indicates progressive muscular atrophy is a form of ALS. Neurology 2009;73:1686-92.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Ince PG, Evans J, Knopp M, Forster G, Hamdalla HH, Wharton SB, et al. “Corticospinal tract degeneration in the progressive muscular atrophy variant of ALS.,” Neurology 2003;60:1252-8.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Cosottini M, Giannelli M, Siciliano G, Lazzarotti G, Michelassi MC, Del Corona A, et al. Diffusion-tensor MR imaging of corticospinal tract in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and progressive muscular atrophy. Radiology 2005;237:258-64.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Kassubek J, Ludolph AC, Müller HP. Neuroimaging of motor neuron diseases. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2012;5:119-27.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Visser J, van den Berg-Vos RM, Franssen H, van den Berg LH, Wokke JH, de Jong JM, et al. Disease course and prognostic factors of progressive muscular atrophy. Arch Neurol 2007;64:522-8.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Rhodes LE, Freeman BK, Auh S, Kokkinis AD, La Pean A, Chen C, et al. “Clinical features of spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy,” Brain 2009;132:3242-51.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Grunseich C, Rinaldi C, Fischbeck KH. “Spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy: Pathogenesis and clinical management.,” Oral Dis 2014;20:6-9.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
La Spada AR, Wilson EM, Lubahn DB, Harding AE, Fischbeck KH. “Androgen receptor gene mutations in X-linked spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy,” Nature 1991;352:77-9.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Garaci F, Toschi N, Lanzafame S, Marfia GA, Marziali S, Meschini A, et al. Brain MR diffusion tensor imaging in kennedy's disease. Neuroradiol J 2015;28:126-32.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Baj A. “Post-poliomyelitis syndrome as a possible viral disease,” Int J Infect Dis 2015;35:107-16.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Turner MR, Talbot K. Mimics and chameleons in motor neurone disease. Pract Neurol 2013;13:153-64.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
Farbu E, Gilhus NE, Barnes MP, Borg K, de Visser M, Driessen A, et al. EFNS guideline on diagnosis and management of post-polio syndrome. Report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol 2006;13:795-801.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.
Jubelt B, Agre JC. Characteristics and management of postpolio syndrome. JAMA 2000;284:412-4.  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.
Abarbanel JM, Lichtenfeld Y, Zirkin H, Louzon Z, Osimani A, Farkash P, et al. Inclusion body myositis in post-poliomyelitis muscular atrophy. Acta Neurol Scand 1988;78:81-4.  Back to cited text no. 59
    
60.
Sandberg A, Stålberg E, “Changes in macro electromyography over time in patients with a history of polio: a comparison of 2 muscles,” Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1174-82.  Back to cited text no. 60
    
61.
Maloney JA, Mirsky DM, Messacar K, Dominguez SR, Schreiner T, Stence NV, et al. MRI findings in children with acute flaccid paralysis and cranial nerve dysfunction occurring during the 2014 enterovirus D68 outbreak. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:245-50.  Back to cited text no. 61
    
62.
Sakamoto M, Watanabe H, Kubosawa H, Ishii T. Unusual MRI findings in a polio survivor. Case Rep Orthop 2016;2016:3179621.  Back to cited text no. 62
    
63.
Cerero Lapiedra R, Moreno López LA, Esparza Gómez GC. Progressive bulbar palsy: A case report diagnosed by lingual symptoms. J Oral Pathol Med 2002;31:277-9.  Back to cited text no. 63
    
64.
Cui F, Liu M, Chen Y, Huang X, Cui L, Fan D, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of motor neuron disease in Chinese patients. Acta Neurol Scand 2014;130:111-7.  Back to cited text no. 64
    
65.
Karam C, Scelsa SN, Macgowan DJ. The clinical course of progressive bulbar palsy. Amyotroph Lateral Scler 2010;11:364-8.  Back to cited text no. 65
    
66.
Voudris KA, Skardoutsou A, Vagiakou EA. Infantile progressive bulbar palsy with deafness. Brain Dev 2002;24:732-5.  Back to cited text no. 66
    
67.
Green P, Wiseman M, Crow YJ, Houlden H, Riphagen S, Lin JP, et al. Brown-Vialetto-Van Laere syndrome, a ponto-bulbar palsy with deafness, is caused by mutations in c20orf54. Am J Hum Genet 2010;86:485-9.  Back to cited text no. 67
    
68.
Hossain MA, Obaid A, Rifai M, Alem H, Hazwani T, Al Shehri A, et al. “Early onset of Fazio-Londe syndrome: the first case report from the Arabian Peninsula.,” Hum genome Var 2017;4:17018.  Back to cited text no. 68
    
69.
Bosch AM, Stroek K, Abeling NG, Waterham HR, Ijlst L, Wanders RJ, et al. The Brown-Vialetto-Van laere and Fazio Londe syndrome revisited: Natural history, genetics, treatment and future perspectives. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2012;7:83.  Back to cited text no. 69
    
70.
Battistini S, Giannini F, Greco G, Bibbò G, Ferrera L, Marini V, et al. SOD1 mutations in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Results from a multicenter Italian study. J Neurol 2005;252:782-8.  Back to cited text no. 70
    
71.
Agosta F, Spinelli EG, Marjanovic IV, Stevic Z, Pagani E, Valsasina P, et al. Unraveling ALS due to SOD1 mutation through the combination of brain and cervical cord MRI. Neurology 2018;90:e707-16.  Back to cited text no. 71
    
72.
Luís ML, Hormigo A, Maurício C, Alves MM, Serrão R. Magnetic resonance imaging in motor neuron disease. J Neurol 1990;237:471-4.  Back to cited text no. 72
    

 
   Authors Top

Dr. Vivek S Yedavalli


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
Previous article   Next article
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Amyotrophic Late...
    Primary Lateral ...
    Progressive Musc...
    Spinal and Bulba...
   Postpolio Syndrome
    Progressive Bulb...
    References
    Authors
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed43    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded13    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal