Search Article 
 Advanced search 
About us - Editorial board - Browse articles - Submit article - Instructions - Subscribe - Advertise - Contacts - Login 
  Users Online: 604 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size   

Browse articles
J Clin Imaging Sci 2018,  8:8

Computed tomography-guided pulmonary nodule microcoil localization technique, misplacement errors, and complications: A pictorial essay

Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, College of Medicine, King Saud University, P.O. Box 7805, Riyadh 11472, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Date of Submission07-Nov-2017
Date of Acceptance11-Jan-2018
Date of Web Publication09-Mar-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Sultan R Alharbi
Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, College of Medicine, King Saud University, P.O. Box 7805, Riyadh 11472
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/2156-7514.227043

Rights and Permissions

Computed tomography-guided pulmonary nodule microcoil localization is done preoperatively to fluoroscopic-guided video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical resection. This pictorial essay explains and illustrates the microcoil localization technique, various microcoil placement errors, intraoperative fluoroscopy-guided resection, and postmicrocoil localization complications.

Keywords: Computed tomography-guided microcoil localization, pulmonary nodule, video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection

How to cite this article:
Alharbi SR. Computed tomography-guided pulmonary nodule microcoil localization technique, misplacement errors, and complications: A pictorial essay. J Clin Imaging Sci 2018;8:8

How to cite this URL:
Alharbi SR. Computed tomography-guided pulmonary nodule microcoil localization technique, misplacement errors, and complications: A pictorial essay. J Clin Imaging Sci [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Feb 23];8:8. Available from:

   Introduction Top

Recently, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has become the choice in the workup of small pulmonary nodules. VATS can be diagnostic and therapeutic, and it can prevent the potential sampling error inherent with a fine-needle aspiration.[1] However, VATS is limited because the surgeon is unable to palpate the lung tissue during operation, which may render the intraoperative identification of small pulmonary nodules difficult.[2] Thus, failure to visualize or palpate small pulmonary nodules has resulted in conversion thoracotomy rates of up to 54%.[3]

Pulmonary nodule localization techniques have been previously described and can be classified into three major types: image-guided surgery, injection of liquid materials through fine needles, and placement of percutaneous wires.[4] Microcoil localization technique to fluoroscopically guided VATS excision of small lung nodules increased the success rate of VATS excision to 97% compared with the reported 54% success rate with the nonguided approach.[5]

   Microcoil Placement Top

A 10-cm-long 21G Chiba needle is loaded with a 7-cm-long, 0.018-inch-diameter fiber-coated platinum microcoil by a microcoil pusher. Using a sterile surgical marker pen, two measurements are marked on the same needle stylet [Figure 1]. Under computed tomography (CT) guidance, the loaded Chiba needle is pushed through and just deeper to the nodule. The premeasured needle stylet is advanced into the Chiba needle deploying about 3 cm of the microcoil into the lung parenchyma just deeper to the nodule [Figure 2]. A second localizer CT scan is obtained to confirm the microcoil deployment and measure the distance necessary to withdraw the tip of the Chiba needle back to the pleural space. After that, the Chiba needle is pulled back to the pleural surface while the needle stylet is held against the end of the microcoil. Then, the needle stylet is advanced completely deploying the remaining microcoil at the visceral pleural surface. After deployment, the Chiba needle is removed from the chest wall [Figure 3].
Figure 1: Diagrammatic scheme of predeployment measurement: After loading the 7-cm microcoil into 10-cm 21G Chiba needle by microcoil pusher, two marks were put by a sterile surgical marker pen on the needle stylet. Mark A: The length enough to push the microcoil to the tip of the needle. Mark B: The length enough to eject 30 mm of the microcoil.

Click here to view
Figure 2: Diagrammatic scheme of deployment location A, a microcoil-loaded Chiba needle was pushed through and just beneath the pulmonary nodule. Location B: The deeper microcoil end tightly coiled deep to the nodule while the superficial end loosely coiled on the visceral pleural surface.

Click here to view
Figure 3: (a) Preprocedural computed tomography with skin localization showing pulmonary nodule. (b) A loaded Chiba needle passed through the pulmonary nodule. (c) The microcoil pushed out and tightly coiled deep to the nodule. (d) The Chiba needle was removed and the proximal microcoil end coiled on the visceral pleural surface.

Click here to view

   Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Guidance Top

Under general anesthesia, a double-lumen endotracheal tube is inserted and the involved lung is deflated. Three thoracoscopic ports are made. Wedge resection of the lung nodule and microcoil is done using grasping instrument and stapling device. Fluoroscopy is used to aid and confirm microcoil and complete resection of the nodule. The resected specimen is sent for frozen section [Figure 4] and [Figure 5].[6],[7] A 24G chest tube is insertwed at the end of the procedure [Figure 6].[8]
Figure 4: Fluoroscopic image during the video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection, showing the microcoil within the lung parenchyma. A thoracoscopic port, grasping instrument, and linear stapling devices are noted.

Click here to view
Figure 5: Surgically resected wedge of the lung containing the microcoil.

Click here to view
Figure 6: Postoperative chest image showing left-sided chest tube.

Click here to view

   Microcoil Misplacement Top

Ideal microcoil placement requires proper predeployment measurements and frequent CT scanning for needle placement and withdrawal guidance. There are two crucial steps to avoid microcoil misplacement: first, good deep anchoring of distal microcoil end to avoid dislodgment and second, CT scan guidance for needle withdrawal to deploy proximal microcoil end on the pleural surface and to avoid chest wall or lung parenchymal misplacement. Although the microcoil is ideally placed through the nodule, it can be placed close to the nodule since the surgeon can see the relationship between the coil and the nodule on postlocalization CT scan [Figure 7] and [Figure 8]. Insufficient distal anchoring may allow the microcoil to be displaced into the chest wall or reformed in the pleural space [Figure 9] and [Figure 10]. Placement of the proximal end of microcoil on the pleural surface is done under CT guidance. Therefore, the microcoil can be misplaced in the chest wall or completely placed in the lung parenchyma [Figure 11] and [Figure 12].[5],[6] Subpleural nodules are often pushed away rather than transgressing by needle. Thus, if microcoil is deployed, it will retract on the plural surface after needle withdrawal [Figure 13].[9]
Figure 7: Microcoil placed just adjacent to the pulmonary nodule.

Click here to view
Figure 8: Microcoil placed about 1 cm beside the pulmonary nodule.

Click here to view
Figure 9: Microcoil misplaced completely within the chest wall. Moderate amount of pneumothorax is noted.

Click here to view
Figure 10: Lateral chest X-ray showing the microcoil fallen into the pleural space at the posterior costophrenic angle.

Click here to view
Figure 11: Proximal microcoil end misplaced into the chest wall.

Click here to view
Figure 12: Microcoil misplaced completely within the lung parenchyma.

Click here to view
Figure 13: Chiba needle tip pushed the pulmonary nodule. After deploying the microcoil and withdrawing the needle, it retracted into the pleural surface and fell in the pleural cavity laterally.

Click here to view

In case of misplacement, surgeons could adjust the thoracoscopic surgery by knowing the relationship of the microcoil location to the nodule on postplacement CT scan. Surgeons can also adjust by removing the misplaced proximal end from the chest wall before deflating the lung or using the fluoroscopy for misplaced microcoil placed completely inside the lung parenchyma. In case of complete dislodgment, another microcoil could be placed properly. Misplaced microcoil in the chest wall, plural space, or lung parenchyma could be removed during surgery or kept in place and is associated with little damage.[5],[6]

   Microcoil Placement Complications Top

CT-guided microcoil localization results in a similar complication profile and rate as has been reported for CT-guided, fine-needle aspiration biopsy, mainly pneumothorax and hemorrhage. Emphysema is a well-known risk factor of increased risk for pneumothorax during percutaneous lung microcoil placement, and CT-guided, fine-needle aspiration biopsy that if symptomatic may necessitate insertion of a chest tube [Figure 14].[6],[9],[10],[11] Postprocedural hemorrhage is manifested by new airspace consolidation [Figure 15]. Wires in the chest wall are not associated with increased patient discomfort or pain.[5]
Figure 14: Postlocalization computed tomography image demonstrates moderate amount of pneumothorax.

Click here to view
Figure 15: Postlocalization computed tomography image demonstrates mild parenchymal lung hemorrhage in the tract of microcoil localization needle.

Click here to view

   Conclusion Top

VATS is diagnostic and therapeutic of small pulmonary nodules. Preoperative pulmonary nodule localization is required to decrease the rate of conversion to thoracotomy. Various localization techniques were described in the literature. Microcoil localization to fluoroscopically guided VATS excision of small lung nodules increased its success rate of excision.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

   References Top

Wang YZ, Boudreaux JP, Dowling A, Woltering EA. Percutaneous localisation of pulmonary nodules prior to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery using methylene blue and TC-99. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;37:237-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
Pittet O, Christodoulou M, Pezzetta E, Schmidt S, Schnyder P, Ris HB, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic resection of a small pulmonary nodule after computed tomography-guided localization with a hook-wire system. Experience in 45 consecutive patients. World J Surg 2007;31:575-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
Suzuki K, Nagai K, Yoshida J, Ohmatsu H, Takahashi K, Nishimura M, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for small indeterminate pulmonary nodules: Indications for preoperative marking. Chest 1999;115:563-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
Dendo S, Kanazawa S, Ando A, Hyodo T, Kouno Y, Yasui K, et al. Preoperative localization of small pulmonary lesions with a short hook wire and suture system: Experience with 168 procedures. Radiology 2002;225:511-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
Mayo JR, Clifton JC, Powell TI, English JC, Evans KG, Yee J, et al. Lung nodules: CT-guided placement of microcoils to direct video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical resection. Radiology 2009;250:576-85.  Back to cited text no. 5
Powell TI, Jangra D, Clifton JC, Lara-Guerra H, Church N, English J, et al. Peripheral lung nodules: Fluoroscopically guided video-assisted thoracoscopic resection after computed tomography-guided localization using platinum microcoils. Ann Surg 2004;240:481-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
Sui X, Zhao H, Yang F, Li JL, Wang J. Computed tomography guided microcoil localization for pulmonary small nodules and ground-glass opacity prior to thoracoscopic resection. J Thorac Dis 2015;7:1580-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
Kastl S, Langwieler TE, Krupski-Berdien G, Demir E, Izbicki JR. Percutaneous localization of pulmonary nodules prior to thoracoscopic surgery by CT-guided hook-wire. Anticancer Res 2006;26:3123-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
Winokur RS, Pua BB, Sullivan BW, Madoff DC. Percutaneous lung biopsy: Technique, efficacy, and complications. Semin Intervent Radiol 2013;30:121-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
Cox JE, Chiles C, McManus CM, Aquino SL, Choplin RH. Transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy: Variables that affect risk of pneumothorax. Radiology 1999;212:165-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
Topal U, Ediz B. Transthoracic needle biopsy: Factors effecting risk of pneumothorax. Eur J Radiol 2003;48:263-7.  Back to cited text no. 11

   Authors Top

Dr. Sultan R Alharbi


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11], [Figure 12], [Figure 13], [Figure 14], [Figure 15]


Previous article   Next article
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
   Microcoil Placement
    Intraoperative F...
    Microcoil Mispla...
    Microcoil Placem...
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded184    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal