Go Back
This abstract was viewed 47 times

Original research article

Sonographic findings of additional malignant lesions in breast carcinoma seen by second look ultrasound

Ana Delgado LagunaS Jimenez ArranzV Quintana ChecaS Alonso RocaD Expósito JiménezJ Oliver-Goldaracena
Department of Radiology, Alcorcon University Hospital Foundation, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
Date of Submission: 14-Apr-2011, Date of Acceptance: 12-Jun-2011, Date of Web Publication: 25-Jun-2011.
Corresponding Author:
Corresponding Author

Ana Delgado Laguna

Department of Radiology, C/Narváez 71 5D. 28009, Madrid, Spain.
E-mail: abdelgado29@gmail.com

Corresponding Author:
Corresponding Author

Ana Delgado Laguna

Department of Radiology, C/Narváez 71 5D. 28009, Madrid, Spain.
E-mail: abdelgado29@gmail.com

DOI: 10.4103/2156-7514.82338 Facebook Twitter Google Linkedin


Objective: The aim is to show ultrasound (US) findings of additional malignant lesions of breast carcinoma visualized on targeted second-look US that were not identified by mammography or US prior to the time of diagnosis.
Materials and Methods: A double-blind retrospective review of the US results from January 2008 through August 2010 of 228 patients with known breast cancer was conducted by two expert radiologists. The focus of the review was on the second-look US characteristics (following BI-RADS criteria) of 26 documented additional malignant lesions of the 76 with successful sonographic correlation from the 123 lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All of them, before the MRI, had an initial mammography and a US with a histopathological biopsy of the primary lesion.
Results: Approximately 60 to 70% of the findings were classified as BI-RADS 2 and BI-RADS 3, while assessing the final US category. The review of the second-look US showed the size of the second malignant additional lesion ranged from 3 to 22 mm, of which 90% were smaller than 10 mm and 66% were smaller than 7 mm.
Conclusions: Most additional malignant lesions, nonpalpable carcinomas, which were previously not detected by mammography and US at first-look diagnosis, were detected by a targeted second-look US examination. These lesions were of category BI-RADS 2 and BI-RADS 3 and smaller than 7 mm.
Keywords: Breast Cancer, Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Second-look Ultrasound, Staging Breast Cancer, Targeted Ultrasound

Cited in 13 Documents

  1. R. Plantade and I. Thomassin-Naggara (2014) Les macrobiopsies mammaires sous IRM. Journal de Radiologie Diagnostique et Interventionnelle 95(9):774. doi: 10.1016/j.jradio.2013.12.012
  2. Se Jin Nam, Eun-Kyung Kim, Min Jung Kim, Hee Jung Moon and Jung Hyun Yoon (2015) Significance of Incidentally Detected Subcentimeter Enhancing Lesions on Preoperative Breast MRI: Role of Second-Look Ultrasound in Lesion Detection and Management. American Journal of Roentgenology 204(3):W357. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12948
  3. S. Alonso Roca, S. Jiménez Arranz, A.B. Delgado Laguna, V. Quintana Checa and E. Grifol Clar (2012) Breast cancer screening in high risk populations. Radiología (English Edition) 54(6):490. doi: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2011.11.002
  4. Claudio Spick and Pascal A. T. Baltzer (2014) Diagnostic Utility of Second-Look US for Breast Lesions Identified at MR Imaging: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Radiology 273(2):401. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140474
  5. Michele Telegrafo, Leonarda Rella, Amato A Stabile Ianora, Giuseppe Angelelli and Marco Moschetta (2016) Supine breast US: how to correlate breast lesions from prone MRI. BJR 89(1059):20150497. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150497
  6. Adrienne R. Newburg, Chloe M. Chhor, Leng Leng Young Lin, Samantha L. Heller, Jennifer Gillman, Hildegard K. Toth and Linda Moy (2017) Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Directed Ultrasound Imaging of Non-Mass Enhancement in the Breast: Outcomes and Frequency of Malignancy. J Ultrasound Med 36(3):493. doi: 10.7863/ultra.16.03001
  7. Alfonso Fausto, Donato Casella, Lucia Mantovani, Giovanna Giacalone and Luca Volterrani (2012) Clinical value of second-look ultrasound: Is there a way to make it objective?. European Journal of Radiology 81:S36. doi: 10.1016/S0720-048X(12)70015-3
  8. Romuald Ferré, Ellen Kao and Benoît Mesurolle (2015) High-Risk Lesions Detected at Second-Look US for Breast Lesions Identified at MR Imaging. Radiology 276(2):614. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015150121
  9. Karen Drukker, Maryellen Giger, Lina Arbash Meinel, Adam Starkey, Jyothi Janardanan and Hiroyuki Abe (2013) Quantitative ultrasound image analysis of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients. Int J CARS 8(6):895. doi: 10.1007/s11548-013-0829-3
  10. R. Plantade and I. Thomassin-Naggara (2014) MRI vacuum-assisted breast biopsies. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging 95(9):779. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2013.12.023
  11. Vivian Youngjean Park, Min Jung Kim, Eun-Kyung Kim and Hee Jung Moon (2013) Second-Look US: How to Find Breast Lesions with a Suspicious MR Imaging Appearance. RadioGraphics 33(5):1361. doi: 10.1148/rg.335125109
  12. V. Fiaschetti, C. Salimbeni, E. Gaspari, G. Kabunda Dembele, F. Bolacchi, E. Cossu, C.A. Pistolese, T. Perretta and G. Simonetti (2012) The role of second-look ultrasound of BIRADS-3 mammary lesions detected by breast MR imaging. European Journal of Radiology 81(11):3178. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.01.027
  13. S. Alonso Roca, S. Jiménez Arranz, A.B. Delgado Laguna, V. Quintana Checa and E. Grifol Clar (2012) Abordaje en el cribado de cáncer mamario en grupos poblacionales de riesgo elevado. Radiología 54(6):490. doi: 10.1016/j.rx.2011.11.013

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.