Go Back
This abstract was viewed 101 times

Technical innovations in imaging sciences


Effect of Picture Archiving and Communication System Image Manipulation on the Agreement of Chest Radiograph Interpretation in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Denise A. CastroAsad Ahmed NaqviElizabeth VandenkerkhofMichael P. FlavinDavid MansonDonald Soboleski
Date of Submission: 10-Mar-2016, Date of Acceptance: 22-Apr-2016, Date of Web Publication: 19-May-2016.
Corresponding Author:
Corresponding Author

Donald Soboleski

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 2V7, Canada.
E-mail: daas@queensu.ca

Corresponding Author:
Corresponding Author

Donald Soboleski

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 2V7, Canada.
E-mail: daas@queensu.ca

DOI: 10.4103/2156-7514.182730 Facebook Twitter Google Linkedin

ABSTRACT


Objective: Variability in image interpretation has been attributed to differences in the interpreters’ knowledge base, experience level, and access to the clinical scenario. Picture archiving and communication system (PACS) has allowed the user to manipulate the images while developing their impression of the radiograph. The aim of this study was to determine the agreement of chest radiograph (CXR) impressions among radiologists and neonatologists and help determine the effect of image manipulation with PACS on report impression. Materials and Methods: Prospective cohort study included 60 patients from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit undergoing CXRs. Three radiologists and three neonatologists reviewed two consecutive frontal CXRs of each patient. Each physician was allowed manipulation of images as needed to provide a decision of “improved,” “unchanged,” or “disease progression” lung disease for each patient. Each physician repeated the process once more; this time, they were not allowed to individually manipulate the images, but an independent radiologist presets the image brightness and contrast to best optimize the CXR appearance. Percent agreement and opposing reporting views were calculated between all six physicians for each of the two methods (allowing and not allowing image manipulation). Results: One hundred percent agreement in image impression between all six observers was only seen in 5% of cases when allowing image manipulation; 100% agreement was seen in 13% of the cases when there was no manipulation of the images. Conclusion: Agreement in CXR interpretation is poor; the ability to manipulate the images on PACS results in a decrease in agreement in the interpretation of these studies. New methods to standardize image appearance and allow improved comparison with previous studies should be sought to improve clinician agreement in interpretation consistency and advance patient care.
Keywords: Agreement and consistency in interpretation, chest radiograph, manipulation of images, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, picture archiving and communication system

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.